<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bhakti in the Business Place</title>
	<atom:link href="http://harmonist.us/2009/09/bhakti-in-the-business-place/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://harmonist.us/2009/09/bhakti-in-the-business-place/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:29:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Babhru</title>
		<link>http://harmonist.us/2009/09/bhakti-in-the-business-place/comment-page-1/#comment-2188</link>
		<dc:creator>Babhru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmonist.us/?p=2720#comment-2188</guid>
		<description>I meant to say, We may note that . . .&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to say, We may note that . . .&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Babhru</title>
		<link>http://harmonist.us/2009/09/bhakti-in-the-business-place/comment-page-1/#comment-2187</link>
		<dc:creator>Babhru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmonist.us/?p=2720#comment-2187</guid>
		<description>Pandu, the answer us what has been proposed before. We should become actually devoted servants of Krishna and let our characters move our colleagues to ask questions. That&#039;s what I&#039;ve done, and the conversations I&#039;ve had with colleagues, and with students as well, have been really interesting and productive. What&#039;s wrong with being known as a good person and having others find out that it&#039;s your devotion that&#039;s responsible for that? As has been pointed out before, certain kinds of dress, haircuts, and other adornments may not be appropriate for many places of work. And leading with your religion may not, either. To generalize too broadly about the nature of the workplace and what may or may not be appropriate just doesn&#039;t work; the readers here are too varied.

We may not that, although Mahaprabhu did debate Prakashananda and the sannyasins of Varanasi, it was his effulgence (his character) that won them over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pandu, the answer us what has been proposed before. We should become actually devoted servants of Krishna and let our characters move our colleagues to ask questions. That&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve done, and the conversations I&#8217;ve had with colleagues, and with students as well, have been really interesting and productive. What&#8217;s wrong with being known as a good person and having others find out that it&#8217;s your devotion that&#8217;s responsible for that? As has been pointed out before, certain kinds of dress, haircuts, and other adornments may not be appropriate for many places of work. And leading with your religion may not, either. To generalize too broadly about the nature of the workplace and what may or may not be appropriate just doesn&#8217;t work; the readers here are too varied.</p>
<p>We may not that, although Mahaprabhu did debate Prakashananda and the sannyasins of Varanasi, it was his effulgence (his character) that won them over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pandu</title>
		<link>http://harmonist.us/2009/09/bhakti-in-the-business-place/comment-page-1/#comment-2183</link>
		<dc:creator>Pandu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmonist.us/?p=2720#comment-2183</guid>
		<description>Hare Krishna is the holy name of the Lord with His beloved Radharani.  If there are negatives associated with chanting Their names, then let us serve Them to help rid Them of any ill-repute.  We should not abandon Krishna&#039;s names, thinking Them too polluted for our association (trinad api sunicena...); we should give our good names for His benefit.  If we don&#039;t do it, who will?  This is a grand opportunity to sacrifice our false prestige for Krishna&#039;s sake.  What is the value of being known as a great diplomat, businessman, yogi, or Vedantist?  My wish is to be known as a devoted servant of Krishna nama.  Hare Krishna.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hare Krishna is the holy name of the Lord with His beloved Radharani.  If there are negatives associated with chanting Their names, then let us serve Them to help rid Them of any ill-repute.  We should not abandon Krishna&#8217;s names, thinking Them too polluted for our association (trinad api sunicena&#8230;); we should give our good names for His benefit.  If we don&#8217;t do it, who will?  This is a grand opportunity to sacrifice our false prestige for Krishna&#8217;s sake.  What is the value of being known as a great diplomat, businessman, yogi, or Vedantist?  My wish is to be known as a devoted servant of Krishna nama.  Hare Krishna.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swami bv tripurari</title>
		<link>http://harmonist.us/2009/09/bhakti-in-the-business-place/comment-page-1/#comment-2172</link>
		<dc:creator>swami bv tripurari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmonist.us/?p=2720#comment-2172</guid>
		<description>I do not think that wearing tilak at work or in the public is always a sign of one&#039;s faith and that not wearing it translates out into weak faith. Audarya-lila touched on this. Not wearing it may be a sign of intelligence in consideration of disseminating the precepts—knowing one&#039;s audience and what will be appreciated and what will not at any given time. Not wearing it may also involve showing respect for others, which is part of being nice and friendly. Again, Audarya-lila has said as much. But moreover nor do I think that the teaching mandates spreading it in all respects. Yes, Sri Caitanya told the brahmin Kurma to do so, but not everyone is a brahmin. Not everyone has a brain for preaching. It may be best for the majority to assist in the dissemination of the teaching by allying themselves with one highly qualified to do so relevant to time and circumstance.  And there is also something to be said for keeping one&#039;s faith to oneself, something deep that speaks of an abiding faith that is not weak and thus in need of an enemy or an ally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think that wearing tilak at work or in the public is always a sign of one&#8217;s faith and that not wearing it translates out into weak faith. Audarya-lila touched on this. Not wearing it may be a sign of intelligence in consideration of disseminating the precepts—knowing one&#8217;s audience and what will be appreciated and what will not at any given time. Not wearing it may also involve showing respect for others, which is part of being nice and friendly. Again, Audarya-lila has said as much. But moreover nor do I think that the teaching mandates spreading it in all respects. Yes, Sri Caitanya told the brahmin Kurma to do so, but not everyone is a brahmin. Not everyone has a brain for preaching. It may be best for the majority to assist in the dissemination of the teaching by allying themselves with one highly qualified to do so relevant to time and circumstance.  And there is also something to be said for keeping one&#8217;s faith to oneself, something deep that speaks of an abiding faith that is not weak and thus in need of an enemy or an ally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaura-Vijaya das</title>
		<link>http://harmonist.us/2009/09/bhakti-in-the-business-place/comment-page-1/#comment-2170</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaura-Vijaya das</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmonist.us/?p=2720#comment-2170</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Citta. The negatives associated with the Hare Krsnas are so high that it is better to abandon it for a fresh start with Gaudiya Vedanta or devotional yoga. In fact, as there ar people continue to live in the 60&#039; mindset of bombarding everybody with their tradition, I also chose to stay away from the association with the Hare Krsnas. Even if people don&#039;t know about it, googling hare krsnas and their history can give them enough information to turn them off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Citta. The negatives associated with the Hare Krsnas are so high that it is better to abandon it for a fresh start with Gaudiya Vedanta or devotional yoga. In fact, as there ar people continue to live in the 60&#8242; mindset of bombarding everybody with their tradition, I also chose to stay away from the association with the Hare Krsnas. Even if people don&#8217;t know about it, googling hare krsnas and their history can give them enough information to turn them off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citta Hari dasa</title>
		<link>http://harmonist.us/2009/09/bhakti-in-the-business-place/comment-page-1/#comment-2167</link>
		<dc:creator>Citta Hari dasa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmonist.us/?p=2720#comment-2167</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So I was just trying to give some encouragement, because I would like to see more devotees feel confident enough in their connection with Krishna consciousness to openly tell people how wonderful it is. I’ve asked many people here in central Pennsylvania, “Have you heard of the Hare Krishnas?” and about half respond with some memory from past decades while the other half (the younger ones usually) haven’t heard of us at all. Srila Prabhupada gave us the most sublime spiritual teachings and along with it the responsibility to share it with others. I don’t think we’re doing enough of that, and I don’t see how we can do it if we stay hidden. Plain and simple, we need to say “Hare Krishna” to people more often.&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Given the history of the &quot;Hare Krsnas&quot; in my opinion it&#039;s a good thing that there are people who have never heard of them. It makes room for a fresh start. Moreover, I personally do not identify myself as such, which is why I said what I did about going incognito if I worked where you work. Please don&#039;t take it personally--I would do that anywhere and if it were anybody, male or female. The reason for my aversion is that too much has gone on in association with that phrase that in my experience more often than not immediately brings &quot;weird cult&quot; to mind. I disagree that to plainly and simply &quot;say Hare Krsna&quot; to people more often is an effective means of making a favorable impression of the tradition in the minds of modern Western people. Consequently when I have the good fortune to speak to someone about bhakti I basically never say the words &quot;Hare Krsna.&quot; Following the lead of my gurudeva I talk about it in terms of &quot;devotional Vedanta&quot; or &quot;devotional yoga.&quot; 

Tilaka and shaved head with sikha I think are fully appropriate for monastics. But for lay practitioners in the West--where such things are for the most part viewed as odd at best unless in the monastic context--I can&#039;t see how that is going to help Gaudiya Vaisnavism grow out of the &quot;Hare Krsna cult&quot; phase into being respected as the deep spiritual tradition it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So I was just trying to give some encouragement, because I would like to see more devotees feel confident enough in their connection with Krishna consciousness to openly tell people how wonderful it is. I’ve asked many people here in central Pennsylvania, “Have you heard of the Hare Krishnas?” and about half respond with some memory from past decades while the other half (the younger ones usually) haven’t heard of us at all. Srila Prabhupada gave us the most sublime spiritual teachings and along with it the responsibility to share it with others. I don’t think we’re doing enough of that, and I don’t see how we can do it if we stay hidden. Plain and simple, we need to say “Hare Krishna” to people more often.</p></blockquote>
<p>Given the history of the &#8220;Hare Krsnas&#8221; in my opinion it&#8217;s a good thing that there are people who have never heard of them. It makes room for a fresh start. Moreover, I personally do not identify myself as such, which is why I said what I did about going incognito if I worked where you work. Please don&#8217;t take it personally&#8211;I would do that anywhere and if it were anybody, male or female. The reason for my aversion is that too much has gone on in association with that phrase that in my experience more often than not immediately brings &#8220;weird cult&#8221; to mind. I disagree that to plainly and simply &#8220;say Hare Krsna&#8221; to people more often is an effective means of making a favorable impression of the tradition in the minds of modern Western people. Consequently when I have the good fortune to speak to someone about bhakti I basically never say the words &#8220;Hare Krsna.&#8221; Following the lead of my gurudeva I talk about it in terms of &#8220;devotional Vedanta&#8221; or &#8220;devotional yoga.&#8221; </p>
<p>Tilaka and shaved head with sikha I think are fully appropriate for monastics. But for lay practitioners in the West&#8211;where such things are for the most part viewed as odd at best unless in the monastic context&#8211;I can&#8217;t see how that is going to help Gaudiya Vaisnavism grow out of the &#8220;Hare Krsna cult&#8221; phase into being respected as the deep spiritual tradition it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Audarya-lila dasa</title>
		<link>http://harmonist.us/2009/09/bhakti-in-the-business-place/comment-page-1/#comment-2161</link>
		<dc:creator>Audarya-lila dasa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmonist.us/?p=2720#comment-2161</guid>
		<description>Many of the devotees who visit this site or are associated with Swami B.V. Tripurari have had negative experiences with devotees and have also seen their share of fundamentalism parading as devotion.  That doesn&#039;t justify harsh treatment - it is merely a fact that may help you to understand the reactions to your assertions.

I work for a private company and it would be totally inappropriate to come into my workplace with a shaved head, a sikha and tilak.  On the other hand, I do have two wonderful pictures of Krsna in my office and I share my devotion to Krsna with those who are interested when and where appropriate.

The workplace is just that - a place where people come together for a common purpose whether it be government service or private industry.  We have company policies as well as laws that prevent prostelytizing in the work place.  Harassment is not just defined as sexual in this day and age and most companies are well aware of the laws and do their best to uphold a standard that is conducive to progress of the work at hand and free of any type of prejudice.

While I agree with you that people are becoming more tolerant of differences I would say conversely that people are more aware of harassment in the form of &#039;religious outreach&#039; and would prefer to be left alone in that regard.  I don&#039;t mean to say that people are closed off and unwilling to learn, far from it - but they don&#039;t want dogma shoved down their throats either.

My own opinion about Tilak, sikha and shaven head as it relates to the workplace is that it totally depends on the work environment.  About the only place where I think it would be appropriate would be in a devotional workplace - but even then, if the company is hiring people at large I would say it is over the top.  That is my personal opinion and not a judgement.

By the way, I don&#039;t think that being nice or friendly is a given.  There are &#039;fruits of the spirit&#039; and one who is seriously practicing bhakti sadhana under good guidance should see signs of those fruits in his/her life.  Nice and friendly are part of that, as are tolerance, forbearance, forgiveness etc.  All too often &#039;devotees&#039; think that following 4 principles and chanting are all that is required for advancement but looking closely reveals that many of those who think that way are not developing the &#039;fruits of the spirit&#039; we are talking about that you seem to feel are a given.  Advancement in bhakti requires good company and deep introspection.  The more a person has bhakti, the more they will be able to give it to others - that&#039;s a fact.  Regardless of external dress, those who have bhakti will have a deep impact on those around them and those with little to no bhakti will have very little to no impact on those around them - again - regardless of external uniform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of the devotees who visit this site or are associated with Swami B.V. Tripurari have had negative experiences with devotees and have also seen their share of fundamentalism parading as devotion.  That doesn&#8217;t justify harsh treatment &#8211; it is merely a fact that may help you to understand the reactions to your assertions.</p>
<p>I work for a private company and it would be totally inappropriate to come into my workplace with a shaved head, a sikha and tilak.  On the other hand, I do have two wonderful pictures of Krsna in my office and I share my devotion to Krsna with those who are interested when and where appropriate.</p>
<p>The workplace is just that &#8211; a place where people come together for a common purpose whether it be government service or private industry.  We have company policies as well as laws that prevent prostelytizing in the work place.  Harassment is not just defined as sexual in this day and age and most companies are well aware of the laws and do their best to uphold a standard that is conducive to progress of the work at hand and free of any type of prejudice.</p>
<p>While I agree with you that people are becoming more tolerant of differences I would say conversely that people are more aware of harassment in the form of &#8216;religious outreach&#8217; and would prefer to be left alone in that regard.  I don&#8217;t mean to say that people are closed off and unwilling to learn, far from it &#8211; but they don&#8217;t want dogma shoved down their throats either.</p>
<p>My own opinion about Tilak, sikha and shaven head as it relates to the workplace is that it totally depends on the work environment.  About the only place where I think it would be appropriate would be in a devotional workplace &#8211; but even then, if the company is hiring people at large I would say it is over the top.  That is my personal opinion and not a judgement.</p>
<p>By the way, I don&#8217;t think that being nice or friendly is a given.  There are &#8216;fruits of the spirit&#8217; and one who is seriously practicing bhakti sadhana under good guidance should see signs of those fruits in his/her life.  Nice and friendly are part of that, as are tolerance, forbearance, forgiveness etc.  All too often &#8216;devotees&#8217; think that following 4 principles and chanting are all that is required for advancement but looking closely reveals that many of those who think that way are not developing the &#8216;fruits of the spirit&#8217; we are talking about that you seem to feel are a given.  Advancement in bhakti requires good company and deep introspection.  The more a person has bhakti, the more they will be able to give it to others &#8211; that&#8217;s a fact.  Regardless of external dress, those who have bhakti will have a deep impact on those around them and those with little to no bhakti will have very little to no impact on those around them &#8211; again &#8211; regardless of external uniform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bhaktikanda</title>
		<link>http://harmonist.us/2009/09/bhakti-in-the-business-place/comment-page-1/#comment-2160</link>
		<dc:creator>Bhaktikanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmonist.us/?p=2720#comment-2160</guid>
		<description>Its quite expected that some older people have memories of the Hare Krishnas of many years ago while younger generations have not heard about Hares at all. This matches with the reactions you Pandu das have had here in this discussion. Some older devotees associate being seen as a Hare Krishna with been seen as cult members or aging hippies at best. Younger devotees like yourself see it in a different way. You are right that the younger generations are not so concerned whether people are labeled hippies or cultists or whatever. They are concerned whether whatever the person does works for the community or not. If you are a &lt;em&gt;good&lt;/em&gt; Hare Krishna, you are good, bas. So the standard now is whether a person contributes what the community needs. So I would say, wearing tilak in the workplace is fine if you are modern and accomodating with coowokers, at the same time that for yourself you don&#039;t compromise the core principles of Krishna Consciousness. I am an older generation devotee. I went through a spot of insecurity of the external symbols such as tilak and neckbeads. But not anymore. If I decide to wear them, I make sure its put on very nicely and I go to the opera in them and it fits right in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its quite expected that some older people have memories of the Hare Krishnas of many years ago while younger generations have not heard about Hares at all. This matches with the reactions you Pandu das have had here in this discussion. Some older devotees associate being seen as a Hare Krishna with been seen as cult members or aging hippies at best. Younger devotees like yourself see it in a different way. You are right that the younger generations are not so concerned whether people are labeled hippies or cultists or whatever. They are concerned whether whatever the person does works for the community or not. If you are a <em>good</em> Hare Krishna, you are good, bas. So the standard now is whether a person contributes what the community needs. So I would say, wearing tilak in the workplace is fine if you are modern and accomodating with coowokers, at the same time that for yourself you don&#8217;t compromise the core principles of Krishna Consciousness. I am an older generation devotee. I went through a spot of insecurity of the external symbols such as tilak and neckbeads. But not anymore. If I decide to wear them, I make sure its put on very nicely and I go to the opera in them and it fits right in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pandu</title>
		<link>http://harmonist.us/2009/09/bhakti-in-the-business-place/comment-page-1/#comment-2158</link>
		<dc:creator>Pandu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 04:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmonist.us/?p=2720#comment-2158</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t call it guru aparadha if an aspiring devotee does not wear tilak for some personal reason, but we should at least honor Srila Prabhupada&#039;s instructions with the desire to follow them better in due time.  I want to emphasize the positive side, the benefit of showing everyone our connection with Krishna, but the response I encountered here has made me a little defensive.  

Each of us feel capable of doing more of one thing and less of another, and that&#039;s ok.  It&#039;s just that I came into this saying that I&#039;ve been wearing tilak to work for several years in a big office and occasionally meeting with outside business people, and have had a very favorable experience with it.  I wanted to encourage other devotees, but I felt like this was met with a very negative reaction.  Ironically, my coworkers and other professionals I meet seem to have no problem with my wearing tilak and shaved head with sikha, but many devotees here don&#039;t like it.  One devotee seemed to suggest I was a fanatic and creepy, and another went so far as to say he wouldn&#039;t want to be associated with me and would remove his neck beads if we worked in the same office to hide any connection.  Many devotees comments here made me feel like they thought there was something wrong with me for wearing tilak wherever I go.  

In fact, the broader society we live has been moving toward acceptance of all kinds of personalities.  That makes looking like a devotee not so difficult.  Personally I just had to get over my own inhibition against it, and since then it&#039;s been easy.  At first I felt a little weird wearing it, other people would pick up on that, but I&#039;m normally quite comfortable with it and others seem to be too.  It helps a lot to see everyone in relation to Krishna, rather than thinking &quot;I&#039;m a devotee but these karmis are so fallen.&quot;

So I was just trying to give some encouragement, because I would like to see more devotees feel confident enough in their connection with Krishna consciousness to openly tell people how wonderful it is.  I&#039;ve asked many people here in central Pennsylvania, &quot;Have you heard of the Hare Krishnas?&quot; and about half respond with some memory from past decades while the other half (the younger ones usually) haven&#039;t heard of us at all.  Srila Prabhupada gave us the most sublime spiritual teachings and along with it the responsibility to share it with others.  I don&#039;t think we&#039;re doing enough of that, and I don&#039;t see how we can do it if we stay hidden.  Plain and simple, we need to say &quot;Hare Krishna&quot; to people more often.  Being nice and friendly goes without saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t call it guru aparadha if an aspiring devotee does not wear tilak for some personal reason, but we should at least honor Srila Prabhupada&#8217;s instructions with the desire to follow them better in due time.  I want to emphasize the positive side, the benefit of showing everyone our connection with Krishna, but the response I encountered here has made me a little defensive.  </p>
<p>Each of us feel capable of doing more of one thing and less of another, and that&#8217;s ok.  It&#8217;s just that I came into this saying that I&#8217;ve been wearing tilak to work for several years in a big office and occasionally meeting with outside business people, and have had a very favorable experience with it.  I wanted to encourage other devotees, but I felt like this was met with a very negative reaction.  Ironically, my coworkers and other professionals I meet seem to have no problem with my wearing tilak and shaved head with sikha, but many devotees here don&#8217;t like it.  One devotee seemed to suggest I was a fanatic and creepy, and another went so far as to say he wouldn&#8217;t want to be associated with me and would remove his neck beads if we worked in the same office to hide any connection.  Many devotees comments here made me feel like they thought there was something wrong with me for wearing tilak wherever I go.  </p>
<p>In fact, the broader society we live has been moving toward acceptance of all kinds of personalities.  That makes looking like a devotee not so difficult.  Personally I just had to get over my own inhibition against it, and since then it&#8217;s been easy.  At first I felt a little weird wearing it, other people would pick up on that, but I&#8217;m normally quite comfortable with it and others seem to be too.  It helps a lot to see everyone in relation to Krishna, rather than thinking &#8220;I&#8217;m a devotee but these karmis are so fallen.&#8221;</p>
<p>So I was just trying to give some encouragement, because I would like to see more devotees feel confident enough in their connection with Krishna consciousness to openly tell people how wonderful it is.  I&#8217;ve asked many people here in central Pennsylvania, &#8220;Have you heard of the Hare Krishnas?&#8221; and about half respond with some memory from past decades while the other half (the younger ones usually) haven&#8217;t heard of us at all.  Srila Prabhupada gave us the most sublime spiritual teachings and along with it the responsibility to share it with others.  I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;re doing enough of that, and I don&#8217;t see how we can do it if we stay hidden.  Plain and simple, we need to say &#8220;Hare Krishna&#8221; to people more often.  Being nice and friendly goes without saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swami bv tripurari</title>
		<link>http://harmonist.us/2009/09/bhakti-in-the-business-place/comment-page-1/#comment-2151</link>
		<dc:creator>swami bv tripurari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmonist.us/?p=2720#comment-2151</guid>
		<description>I do not agree with everything you have written in this last post, but without going into that, allow me to ask if it is your position that there is only one way to look at the subject: if Prabhupada&#039;s disciples do not wear tilak to work, etc. they are committing guru aparadha? If they are committing this offense, they will never be able to chant offenslessly until they begin wearing tilak to work. Disobeying the guru (gurur avajna) in a nama aparadha. Again, is this the position you are taking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not agree with everything you have written in this last post, but without going into that, allow me to ask if it is your position that there is only one way to look at the subject: if Prabhupada&#8217;s disciples do not wear tilak to work, etc. they are committing guru aparadha? If they are committing this offense, they will never be able to chant offenslessly until they begin wearing tilak to work. Disobeying the guru (gurur avajna) in a nama aparadha. Again, is this the position you are taking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

