<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why We Rationalize</title>
	<atom:link href="http://harmonist.us/2010/02/why-we-rationalize/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://harmonist.us/2010/02/why-we-rationalize/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 08:09:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gurunistha dasa</title>
		<link>http://harmonist.us/2010/02/why-we-rationalize/comment-page-1/#comment-3687</link>
		<dc:creator>Gurunistha dasa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 16:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmonist.us/?p=4298#comment-3687</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s sloppy logic to say that somehow the fact that a lot of people seem to get into religion out of a psychological need for control and order would mean that religion is a man-made construct. One can certainly choose the right thing for the wrong reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s sloppy logic to say that somehow the fact that a lot of people seem to get into religion out of a psychological need for control and order would mean that religion is a man-made construct. One can certainly choose the right thing for the wrong reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaura-Vijaya</title>
		<link>http://harmonist.us/2010/02/why-we-rationalize/comment-page-1/#comment-3674</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaura-Vijaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmonist.us/?p=4298#comment-3674</guid>
		<description>So at every instant, we have make a hard decision based on partial information. So though ideally we may say that we don&#039;t know anything, that won&#039;t help us to live even for one instant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So at every instant, we have make a hard decision based on partial information. So though ideally we may say that we don&#8217;t know anything, that won&#8217;t help us to live even for one instant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citta Hari dasa</title>
		<link>http://harmonist.us/2010/02/why-we-rationalize/comment-page-1/#comment-3672</link>
		<dc:creator>Citta Hari dasa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmonist.us/?p=4298#comment-3672</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an interesting point--in either case, theistic or atheistic, perhaps what counts is the sense of surety  the person has in relation to their world view that gives the sense of control more than the world view per se.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting point&#8211;in either case, theistic or atheistic, perhaps what counts is the sense of surety  the person has in relation to their world view that gives the sense of control more than the world view per se.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atmananda</title>
		<link>http://harmonist.us/2010/02/why-we-rationalize/comment-page-1/#comment-3670</link>
		<dc:creator>atmananda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmonist.us/?p=4298#comment-3670</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;By knowing that there is some sense and purpose to the world. There is justice, good etc and there is some absolute value to things.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Couldn&#039;t an atheist view provide some sense of control as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>By knowing that there is some sense and purpose to the world. There is justice, good etc and there is some absolute value to things.</p></blockquote>
<p>Couldn&#8217;t an atheist view provide some sense of control as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaura-Vijaya</title>
		<link>http://harmonist.us/2010/02/why-we-rationalize/comment-page-1/#comment-3657</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaura-Vijaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmonist.us/?p=4298#comment-3657</guid>
		<description>By knowing that there is some sense and purpose to the world. There is justice, good etc and there is some absolute value to things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By knowing that there is some sense and purpose to the world. There is justice, good etc and there is some absolute value to things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atmananda</title>
		<link>http://harmonist.us/2010/02/why-we-rationalize/comment-page-1/#comment-3656</link>
		<dc:creator>Atmananda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmonist.us/?p=4298#comment-3656</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;God is a illusory pattern for people to be more in control.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
How does God make people feel more in control?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>God is a illusory pattern for people to be more in control.</p></blockquote>
<p>How does God make people feel more in control?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaura-Vijaya</title>
		<link>http://harmonist.us/2010/02/why-we-rationalize/comment-page-1/#comment-3640</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaura-Vijaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmonist.us/?p=4298#comment-3640</guid>
		<description>Many people like Dawkins push this idea to the extreme and say that people are finding &quot;patterns&quot; or &quot;design&quot; in things that are random to feel more in control. God for example is a tool to make more sense for random things and God is a illusory pattern for people to be more in control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people like Dawkins push this idea to the extreme and say that people are finding &#8220;patterns&#8221; or &#8220;design&#8221; in things that are random to feel more in control. God for example is a tool to make more sense for random things and God is a illusory pattern for people to be more in control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
